- From: Nico Michaelis <nico.michaelis@sohard.de>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:45:58 +0200
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> I would like at least one other reviewer to concur. The document is not
> long, and will not take you long to review. Please help!
I've had a look.
I was a little surprised that the result of an ask query is not encoded
like other literal booleans. So instead of the
"boolean": "true"
I would encode the result of an ask query like
"result" : { "type": "literal", "value": "true", "datatype":
"xsd:boolean"}
. I guess that would be a good idea for consistency and existensibility.
If you think that "result" is a bad name, because "results" is already
in use, I would propose "answer" - but I think that calling the object
"boolean" does not give an appropriate meaning.
I also noticed a little typo - a superflous "," before the ending "}" in
the description of literals with datatypes:
{ "type": "literal", "value": "S", "datatype": "D",}
I'm satisfied with the rest of the document.
Nico
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2011 07:46:24 UTC