- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 09:41:30 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I included this in the agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2011-05-03 any other issues which need discussion, please ideally raise them before the call! Axel On 2 May 2011, at 20:25, Andy Seaborne wrote: > We need to decide what to do about simple literals / xsd:strings > > thread: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011AprJun/0095.html > > Nothing is a possibility but it needs to be an active decision, not a > silent default. We then need to feed that back to RDF-WG. > > Andy > > On 02/05/11 15:28, Axel Polleres wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I will hopefully upload a formal agenda hopefully later today at the usual place: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2011-05-03 > > > > but here is alrady what is planned for tomorrow: > > > > We shall go through all documents: > > > > 1) check with editors whether ready for LC publication > > - any open issues on to_last_call wiki? > > - any critical reviewer comments open? > > - any critical comments-list comments open? > > - pubrules check done? > > 2) PROPOSED: publish [docname] as Last call working draft > > (we need a formal vote there, I assume for minor open issues, this can also vary to) > > PROPOSED: publish [docname] as Last call working draft modulo ACTION-XYZ > > (i.e. allow us to assign actions to reviewers/editors to resolve minor issues bilaterally without the need for another formal group decision) > > > > If editors could answer to the subitems of 1) prior to the call tomorrow, that might help us! > > > > best, > > Axel > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 08:41:59 UTC