- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:17:08 -0500
- To: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
- CC: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 11/10/2010 12:17 PM, Alexandre Passant wrote: > > On 10 Nov 2010, at 17:09, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> >> >> On 10/11/10 03:41, Alexandre Passant wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 10 Nov 2010, at 02:51, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> >>>> Minutes for our short meeting: >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-11-09 >>>> >>>> [[ >>>> >>>> 2. update shortcuts >>>> >>>> LeeF: >>>> Summary: slight preference in today's group for including shortcuts - motivation is ease of use of language, ease of optimization >>> >>> Is that a formal OK from the group or do we need a vote on that in next telco. ? (as many people were not attending the call) >>> >>> Alex. >> >> It's Lee's summary of the discussion, which I clipped out to help people catchup (you do read the whole transcript don't you? :-) >> >> There was a strawpoll of the people present, nothing more. It needs to come up more formally if you want a WG decision. > > Yes, I'd like a more formal decision to see if the group is happy to have the current proposal integrated in the SPARQL Update document. > Can we schedule the vote for the next telco ? I won't be here but Axel could vote on behalf of DERI. > Or should we have a website poll as we've done for the features in the first phase of the group > Yes, this will be on next Tuesday's agenda. Lee > Alex. > >> >> Andy > > -- > Dr. Alexandre Passant > Digital Enterprise Research Institute > National University of Ireland, Galway > :me owl:sameAs<http://apassant.net/alex> . > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 18:17:44 UTC