- From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:17:46 +0800
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 10 Nov 2010, at 17:09, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 10/11/10 03:41, Alexandre Passant wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 10 Nov 2010, at 02:51, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >>> Minutes for our short meeting: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-11-09 >>> >>> [[ >>> >>> 2. update shortcuts >>> >>> LeeF: >>> Summary: slight preference in today's group for including shortcuts - motivation is ease of use of language, ease of optimization >> >> Is that a formal OK from the group or do we need a vote on that in next telco. ? (as many people were not attending the call) >> >> Alex. > > It's Lee's summary of the discussion, which I clipped out to help people catchup (you do read the whole transcript don't you? :-) > > There was a strawpoll of the people present, nothing more. It needs to come up more formally if you want a WG decision. Yes, I'd like a more formal decision to see if the group is happy to have the current proposal integrated in the SPARQL Update document. Can we schedule the vote for the next telco ? I won't be here but Axel could vote on behalf of DERI. Or should we have a website poll as we've done for the features in the first phase of the group Alex. > > Andy -- Dr. Alexandre Passant Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Galway :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Wednesday, 10 November 2010 17:19:56 UTC