W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: agenda: RDF Data Access 22 Feb

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:52:40 -0600
Message-Id: <p06200706be3fddad3118@[]>
To: andy.seaborne@hp.com, eric@w3.org
Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
>3. SPARQL QL publication
>ACTION: EricP, make sure editor's draft as an inline issue (to be
>published) that we need to work this out
>DONE: http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050217/

I notice this in

used in conjunction with optional, it can be used to test whether a 
graph pattern with at least one variable in it has been matched. When 
also used in conjunction with not, it can test to see that a triple 
has not been asserted. This is called Negation as Failure in logic 

but NOT does not appear in the grammar anywhere. Is this an editing 
bug, or am I missing something?

IHMC		(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Monday, 21 February 2005 18:53:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:33 UTC