public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from October 2006 by thread

Re: Filter scope and optionals Jorge Pérez (Monday, 30 October)

[Fwd: SPARQL OPTIONAL vs UNION treatment of sub-graph matching] Seaborne, Andy (Friday, 27 October)

SPARQL OPTIONAL vs UNION treatment of sub-graph matching Patrick Shironoshita (Thursday, 26 October)

Definition of FilteredBasicGraphPattern in SPARQL grammar Arjohn Kampman (Thursday, 26 October)

white space in RDFLiteral allowed? Arjohn Kampman (Monday, 23 October)

make regex optional in SPARQL Henry Story (Monday, 23 October)

Comments on dawg test cases Faisal Alkhateeb (Monday, 16 October)

Re: Issues with evaluating optional: ... Jorge Pérez (Saturday, 14 October)

browser problem viewing http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20061004/ Axel Polleres (Monday, 9 October)

JSON from SPARQL for multiple assertions conor325 (Saturday, 7 October)

bnode issue in new spec - impact on test cases? Dan Brickley (Friday, 6 October)

bnode issue in new spec - impact on test cases? Dan Brickley (Friday, 6 October)

Why not application/json? Mark Baker (Thursday, 5 October)

SPARQL - UNION - disjunction issue MacLeod Nichols (Saturday, 30 September)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 October 2006 15:15:31 UTC