- From: Faisal Alkhateeb <Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:12:37 +0200
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Hello, The result of the following query is not clear http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-triple-pattern-005 and i think the result is empty. Regarding the sorting of the following query, is not it in the reverse order (that is descending as it is clear, since E > F > B > A). http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sort-1 And so on for the rest of sorting queries. The sorting result of the following query is mixed (i.e., neither ascending nor descending) http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#sort-7 I want to know if it is syntactically possible to use the keyword FILTER as a namespace prefix as done in the following query: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#keyword-filter-as-a-namespace- prefix In the following queries, we use '(' after WHERE clause instead of '{'. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-unsaid-001 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#dawg-unsaid-002 And finally, for the following query, the result is not empty: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#extendedtype-ne-fail -- Faisal Alkhateeb INRIA Rhone-Alpes ZIRST - 655 avenue de l'Europe - Montbonnot 38334 Saint Ismier Cedex - France Tel: +33 4 76 61 52 66 Fax: +33 4 76 61 52 07
Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 08:12:51 UTC