- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:08:22 -0600
- To: public-cwm-bugs@w3.org
The DAWG followed your advice to use text/rdf+n3 in our examples http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Jan/0007.html but reviewers have noticed that it's not registered http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2006Jan/0161.html As a TAG member and a W3C/IETF liaison, I have a hard time arguing against him... though perhaps the use in an example is not a critical issue. I think I heard TimBL was applying to have the type registered. Please track this bug until that's done, or at least in progress in a visible way. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 22:08:26 UTC