Re: accessingCollections: postpone due to lack of design/implementation experience?

You're welcome to send comments to
the comments mailing list (
but the WG mailing list ( is for
WG discussions, please.

you wrote:
> Yes yes yes yes yes!  This should be a v1 requirement!  One large
omission from
> the spec is how to handle collections and containers.

and you gave an example, but it was an artificial (xyz) example;
the WG was well aware of this ommission when we decided to
postpone this issue.

We will only reconsider our decision if we have new information.
The most relevant information is use cases/stories that say
why it's better to delay the release of SPARQL to get this
feature in, rather than release SPARQL as is and add it later.

So far, not very many WG members see a pressing need for this

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 13:55:14 UTC