public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from February 2005 by date

Monday, 28 February 2005

Re: Questions about OPTIONAL Seaborne, Andy

Friday, 25 February 2005

RE: Questions about OPTIONAL Geoff Chappell
Re: Questions about OPTIONAL Seaborne, Andy
Re: more on optionals Jeen Broekstra

Thursday, 24 February 2005

RE: Questions about OPTIONAL Geoff Chappell
RE: Questions about OPTIONAL jos.deroo@agfa.com
RE: Questions about OPTIONAL Geoff Chappell
RE: more on optionals Geoff Chappell
RE: Questions about OPTIONAL Geoff Chappell
RE: Questions about OPTIONAL jos.deroo@agfa.com
Re: Questions about OPTIONAL Seaborne, Andy
more on optionals Jeen Broekstra

Wednesday, 23 February 2005

Re: Problems with WITH and FROM Seaborne, Andy
RE: Questions about OPTIONAL Geoff Chappell
Re: Problems with WITH and FROM Bob MacGregor
Re: Question/Comment on FROM and WITH Alberto Reggiori
RE: Question/Comment on FROM and WITH Geoff Chappell
Re: Questions about OPTIONAL ... and declarative syntax Bob MacGregor
Re: lang example in new spec: s/mbox/name/ ? Eric Prud'hommeaux
Re: Question/Comment on FROM and WITH Seaborne, Andy
Re: Questions about OPTIONAL Seaborne, Andy
Re: Streaming version of CONSTRUCT Seaborne, Andy
Re: Problems with WITH and FROM Seaborne, Andy

Tuesday, 22 February 2005

Questions about OPTIONAL Geoff Chappell
Question/Comment on FROM and WITH Geoff Chappell
Re: Observations (named graphs, blank node closurs) Dan Connolly

Sunday, 20 February 2005

BOUND operator; and can other operators apply to unbound variables? Bob MacGregor

Friday, 18 February 2005

Re: XML result format and datatypes Damian Steer
lang example in new spec: s/mbox/name/ ? Dan Brickley

Thursday, 3 February 2005

Re: SPARQL Protocol and Unicode characters Arjohn Kampman
SPARQL Protocol and Unicode characters Arjohn Kampman

Wednesday, 2 February 2005

Re: Comments on the SPARQL protocol Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 1 February 2005

Comments on the SPARQL protocol Mark Baker

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2005 11:06:47 UTC