Re: v.164 has ISSUE-18 resolution related changes

Thanks Souri.
Alex already created an action for this.
We will update the figures.


On 15/06/2011 16:54, Souripriya Das wrote:
> Noted that .png files for figures in R2RML spec need to be updated:
>     * Saw that SubjectMapClass.png is same size as (and probably
>       identical to) ObjectMapClass.png. In fact, SubjectMapClass.png
>       file seems to contain picture for the ObjectMap class.
>     * LogicalTable class needs to be added.
>     * Labels in the figures need to be consistent with the new naming
>       schema (SubjectMap instead of SubjectMapClass, etc.)
> Thanks,
> - Souri.
> Souripriya Das wrote:
>> I have updated the R2RML draft based on resolution for ISSUE-18 
>> (reuse of SQL query, or logical table, in multiple TriplesMap elements).
>> However, to avoid complexity involving class hierarchy, I have not 
>> introduced any subclasses for the new rr:LogicalTable class.
>> If needed, we can discuss this tweak in the next meeting.
>> Thanks,
>> - Souri.

Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 15:04:50 UTC