Re: v.164 has ISSUE-18 resolution related changes

Thanks Boris. Before I forget, another item is to add a "LogicalTable" 
block, probably just above the "SubjectMap" block, in "Figure 1a: An 
Overview of the R2RML Classes." -- Souri.

Boris Villazón Terrazas wrote:
> Thanks Souri.
> Alex already created an action for this.
> We will update the figures.
>
> Boris
>
> On 15/06/2011 16:54, Souripriya Das wrote:
>> Noted that .png files for figures in R2RML spec need to be updated:
>>
>>     * Saw that SubjectMapClass.png is same size as (and probably
>>       identical to) ObjectMapClass.png. In fact, SubjectMapClass.png
>>       file seems to contain picture for the ObjectMap class.
>>     * LogicalTable class needs to be added.
>>     * Labels in the figures need to be consistent with the new naming
>>       schema (SubjectMap instead of SubjectMapClass, etc.)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Souri.
>>
>> Souripriya Das wrote:
>>> I have updated the R2RML draft based on resolution for ISSUE-18 
>>> (reuse of SQL query, or logical table, in multiple TriplesMap 
>>> elements).
>>>
>>> However, to avoid complexity involving class hierarchy, I have not 
>>> introduced any subclasses for the new rr:LogicalTable class.
>>> If needed, we can discuss this tweak in the next meeting.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> - Souri.
>>>
>