Re: Last Call for Comments before FPWD

Here are some thoughts from a quick look:

* funny to define an RDF dataset from the SPARQL spec :-) I would
suggest to use instead.

* I think the examples should be defined in term of SQL CREATE
statements. Even if the tabular representation is perfectly
understandable, this is the easiest to avoid any ambiguity.


On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 10:11 -0700, ashok malhotra wrote:
> Good comments from Soeren!  Editors, if you cannot take these into account before publication,
> you may want to create issues in the text.  We can work on these later.
> All the best, Ashok
> On 10/23/2010 8:34 AM, Sören Auer wrote:
> > On 22.10.2010 10:04, Harry Halpin wrote:
> >> I'd like to have when people send in FPWD comments, they cc the listserv.
> >
> > I read the document carefully and added a large number of improvements suggestions as well as many minor corrections.
> > Please find my changes and comments in the attached document (in both Word and PDF version). I guess not all of the comments have to be addressed for the FPWD.
> >
> > Have a nice weekend everybody,
> >
> > Sören

Received on Sunday, 24 October 2010 21:47:32 UTC