- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 23:19:42 +0100
- To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
- Cc: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com, Sören Auer <soeren.auer@gmail.com>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, RDB2RDF WG <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Alexandre, On 24 Oct 2010, at 22:47, Alexandre Bertails wrote: > * funny to define an RDF dataset from the SPARQL spec :-) I would > suggest to use > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#section-Graph-syntax > instead. RDF dataset ≠ RDF graph. There is no definition of RDF dataset in RDF Concepts. Best, Richard > > * I think the examples should be defined in term of SQL CREATE > statements. Even if the tabular representation is perfectly > understandable, this is the easiest to avoid any ambiguity. > > Alexandre. > > > On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 10:11 -0700, ashok malhotra wrote: >> Good comments from Soeren! Editors, if you cannot take these into >> account before publication, >> you may want to create issues in the text. We can work on these >> later. >> All the best, Ashok >> >> On 10/23/2010 8:34 AM, Sören Auer wrote: >>> On 22.10.2010 10:04, Harry Halpin wrote: >>>> I'd like to have when people send in FPWD comments, they cc the >>>> listserv. >>> >>> I read the document carefully and added a large number of >>> improvements suggestions as well as many minor corrections. >>> Please find my changes and comments in the attached document (in >>> both Word and PDF version). I guess not all of the comments have >>> to be addressed for the FPWD. >>> >>> Have a nice weekend everybody, >>> >>> Sören >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2010 22:20:34 UTC