- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 08:10:50 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26324
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike@saxonica.com
--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
The expression 12(1) is syntactically valid but is always a type error (rather
like the expression ("London"+1). So you're really asking a policy question:
should XQueryX be able to represent every syntactically-valid XQuery
expression, or should it only be required to represent expressions that have no
static errors. (And then the sub-question, are type errors regarded as static
errors for this purpose?)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 14 July 2014 08:10:51 UTC