- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 13:42:40 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9715
Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jonathan.robie@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2010-05-12 13:42:40 ---
I agree that it would be good to have the same version number for the entire
family of specs.
Version numbers are a bit of a bike shed, and it's easy to lose enormous
amounts of time discussing the optimal version number. To me, the two
requirements are (1) the number should be the same for each spec in the family,
and (2) the number needs to be >= 2.1.
If we want to avoid going directly from XQuery 1.0 to XQuery 3.0, we could do,
say 2.5. Or we could go to 3.0, with a note in the status section explaining
the jump.
My personal opinion only. The chairs decide this kind of thing, not me.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:42:42 UTC