- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 13:47:31 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9715 --- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2010-05-12 13:47:31 --- We have discussed bringing the version numbers of all the specs into alignment, and there was a good level of agreement that was desirable, though it has proved more difficult to get consensus on what the aligned version number should be. It ought to be easy, but there are psychological factors in choosing a version number, there are unstated but strongly-held beliefs about the correlation between the size of the numeric increment and the level of compatibility, there are process issues (like changing WG charters), and there are technical issues in changing the build system. In an ideal world I agree with you entirely that 3.0 would be a more logical choice than 2.1. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:47:32 UTC