- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 13:40:52 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9716 Summary: "stringify" Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Working drafts Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSLT 2.1 AssignedTo: mike@saxonica.com ReportedBy: davidc@nag.co.uk QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org I'm not sure that "stringify" is a word, and perhaps more importantly, the behaviour of on-no-match? = "stringify" is not to generate a string but rather to copy text nodes. The difference between strings and text nodes doesn't usually matter, but when it does matter, it confuses people, so not using a syntax based on the word "string" would be good I think. It's easier to criticise the current name than to suggest a new one. copy-text perhaps. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:40:57 UTC