W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > November 2004

Re: [RESPONSE qt-2004Feb0384-01] [General] Please use less namespaces

From: Per Bothner <per@bothner.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:43:30 -0800
Message-ID: <41ACCD62.6050308@bothner.com>
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org

In response to Martin Duerst's:
 > For example, I don't see any need to have the xdt namespace

Jonathan Robie explains the need for the xdt:untypedAtomic type.
However, you do not explain why it needs to be in a different
namespace than xs:integer.  What is wrong with xs:untypedAtomic?
Are things so bureaucratic at the W3C that they won't allow you
to add a type so the xs namespace?  Note this has nothing to do
with adding xs:untypedAtomic to XML Schema; it's just a matter
of sharing a namespace.
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2004 19:43:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:02 UTC