- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:33:55 GMT
- To: mhk@mhk.me.uk
- CC: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> The only reason I didn't do this is the danger of getting such examples > wrong. From bitter experience, I'm reluctant to include examples without > testing them, and testing all possible variations of line endings is not > something that gets me leaping out of bed in the morning. Examples are there > to clarify the specification, not to provide code that the user can take > advantage of in real applications. Michael, I wanted to put on record that I thought (and think) that it would be better for the line endings to be automatically normalised, and to suggest a change in the example if they were not going to be normalised. However I am happy to leave this to the WG and your editorial discretion and formally you can consider this thread closed. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 29 November 2004 10:59:37 UTC