- From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@colina.demon.co.uk>
- Date: 01 Nov 2004 18:02:52 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
I'm am confused as to what is supposed to happen if the argument to fn:doc() includes a fragment-id. On the one hand, the draft says the argument is an xs:anyURI, passed as an xs:string, so it is legitimate to include a fragment-id. On the other hand, the semantics is defined as a mapping of strings onto DOCUMENT nodes, and a fragment-id cannot point to a document node (though it might point to a document element). But the way URIs are mapped onto document nodes is not specified. Does this mean it is implementation-defined as to whether the fragment-id is used, or is it an error to include one? -- Colin Paul Adams Preston Lancashire
Received on Monday, 1 November 2004 18:05:47 UTC