W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2003

RE: ORA-FO-MAXMIN-NODES 15.3.3 fn:max, 15.3.4 fn:min

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:23:03 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB09D18D22@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Stephen Buxton" <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Steve:
Thank you for your comment!
 
As Mike Kay replied to an earlier note of yours re. passing a sequence
of nodes to fn:sum "You can pass in a sequence of nodes; under the
function
calling rules they will be atomized. The sequence must then consist of
values of a single type."  
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2003Jun/0315.html
 
Thus, you can pass a sequence of nodes to fn:max and fn:min.
 

All the best, Ashok 

________________________________

From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Buxton
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 6:10 PM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: ORA-FO-MAXMIN-NODES 15.3.3 fn:max, 15.3.4 fn:min 

 

Functions and Operators, Section 15.3.3 fn:max, 15.3.4 fn:min 


Why aren't these defined on nodes ? 
It makes sense to operate on nodes that have simple content.

 
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2003 17:23:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:48 UTC