W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2003

RE: ORA-FO-MAXMIN 15.3.3 fn:max, 15.3.4 fn:min

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:30:16 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB09D18D33@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Stephen Buxton" <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

Thanks for your comment.


Yes, if fn:min() or fn:max() are passed a sequence consisting only of
NaN values, these values are removed.

The input is now an empty sequence and, thus, an empty sequence is
returned.  We have reordered the

rules in fn:min() and fn:max() to make this clearer.


All the best, Ashok 


From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Buxton
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 6:15 PM
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Subject: ORA-FO-MAXMIN 15.3.3 fn:max, 15.3.4 fn:min 


Functions and Operators, Section 15.3.3 fn:max, 15.3.4 fn:min 

If a sequence contains only "NaN" values, then the result of fn:max or
fn:min is the empty sequence. 
Is this correct ?
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2003 17:30:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:48 UTC