W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2003

RE: ORA-FO-OPEQUAL

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:48:40 -0700
Message-ID: <E5B814702B65CB4DA51644580E4853FB09841C10@red-msg-12.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Ashok Malhotra" <ashokma@microsoft.com>, "Stephen Buxton" <stephen.buxton@oracle.com>, <public-qt-comments@w3.org>

Steve:
The behaviour of the operators is defined in the language documents.  It
says there that the operands are checked for empty sequence before the
functions are invoked and so the op: functions do not need to define the
behaviour for empty sequence inputs.  

All the best, Ashok

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ashok Malhotra
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:45 PM
> To: 'Stephen Buxton'; public-qt-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RE: ORA-FO-OPEQUAL
> 
> Steve:
> The behaviour of the operators is defined in the language documents.
It
> says there that the operands are checked for empty sequence before the
> functions are invoked and so the op: functions do not need to define
the
> behaviour for empty sequence inputs.
> 
> 
> All the best, Ashok
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-qt-comments-
> > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Buxton
> > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 7:44 AM
> > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: ORA-FO-OPEQUAL
> >
> >
> > Where are the op-equal operators/functions defined ?
> >
> > The specific equality functions (e.g. op-numeric-equal) are defined,
but
> > what is the behaviour on empty sequences as arguments to equals ?
> >
> >
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 16:49:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:48 UTC