- From: Kay, Michael <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 17:34:10 +0100
- To: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, public-qt-comments@w3.org
Thanks for the comment. I don't have any strong views on this. Michael Kay > -----Original Message----- > From: public-qt-comments-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-qt-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Carlisle > Sent: 17 December 2003 12:12 > To: public-qt-comments@w3.org > Subject: [XSLT2.0] 16.6.5 system-property > > > > > > xsl:is-schema-aware, xsl:supports-serialization and > xsl:supports-backwards-compatibility all return "yes"/"no" > would it be easier/more consistent (wrt casting to boolean) > if they returned "true"/"false" ? > > David > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star > Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more > information on a proactive anti-virus service working around > the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ >
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2003 11:34:15 UTC