- From: Edward L. Knoll <ed.knoll@cosd.fedex.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 08:35:39 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- CC: John Mercado <johnkmercado@yahoo.com>, XQuery Comments <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
That's rather unfortunate. It is very limiting when constructing reusable components to encounter systems which do not allow for the nature/type of an element/variable/data memeber to be variant. This invariably ends up being a short-sighted attitude. Ed Knoll > Thank you for your question. The WG discussed this and decided that > it was enough to have a instance-of function and that a type accessor > was not needed. > > All the best, Ashok > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Mercado [mailto:johnkmercado@yahoo.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 5:17 AM > To: XQuery Comments > Subject: Why no xf:type accessor? > > The data model draft describes a number of accessors, > most of which appear in F&O. But I don't see a type > accessor. I see I can get the typed value, and I > guess I could use instanceof to test to see if it's a > specific type, but what if I want the type name as a > QName? It seems like that would be a useful function. > Any reason it was omitted? > > Thanks, > John > -- Edward L. Knoll Phone (work) : (719)484-2717 e-mail (work) : ed.knoll@cosd.fedex.com e-mail (business): eknoll@sf-inc.com e-mail (personal): edward@elknoll.com
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 03:24:22 UTC