- From: Jeff Kenton <jkenton@datapower.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:49:37 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Kay, Michael" <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>
- CC: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Kay, Michael wrote: >>The August WD has changed the description of StepExpr (Section >>3.2.1) so that PrimaryExpr is now possible. Does this mean >>that a PathExpr like: >> >> A/B/3.14159 >> >>is legal? > > > It's legal in the grammar, but it's a type error. Just like: > > A | B | 3.14159 > > which is grammatically legal, but a type error, in XPath 1.0. > Michael, Thanks for the quick reply. Perhaps I chose a bad example. I still don't see the use of allowing a PrimaryExpr as a StepExpr. Since it was just added to the WD, I assume there was a good use for it. Can you show an example? Thanks. -- -------------------------- Jeff Kenton Datapower Technology, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 24 September 2002 03:24:24 UTC