- From: Ashok Malhotra <ashokma@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:50:49 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com>, <ed.knoll@cosd.fedex.com>
- Cc: "John Mercado" <johnkmercado@yahoo.com>, "XQuery Comments" <public-qt-comments@w3.org>
Jonathan: We need to solve this problem in any case. The Schema WG has started to discuss the NuNs question again and I'm hoping there will be a proposal soon. All the best, Ashok =========================================================== Ashok Malhotra <mailto: ashokma@microsoft.com> Microsoft Corporation 212 Hessian Hills Road Croton-On-Hudson, NY 10520 USA Redmond: 425-703-9462 New York: 914-271-6477 -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Robie [mailto:jonathan.robie@datadirect-technologies.com] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:09 AM To: ed.knoll@cosd.fedex.com; Ashok Malhotra Cc: John Mercado; XQuery Comments Subject: Re: Why no xf:type accessor? One problem with an xf:type accessor is that not every type has a unique name - there are anonymous types that have no name, and local element and attribute declarations whose names may be identical to other element and attribute declarations. One way of solving this would be to create a universal naming schema for all types that can occur, but this was deemed too complex for XPath and XQuery 1.0. Jonathan
Received on Monday, 30 September 2002 10:26:22 UTC