Re: Votes (deadline Thursday noon, GMT): ISSUE-225, objects in the Universe of discourse

Hi Tim

On 01/26/2012 11:09 PM, Timothy Lebo wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:29 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:
>> Hi Graham,
>>>> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains,
>>>> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation,
>>>> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After
>>>> removal belong to the universe of discourse.
>>> I'm inclined to say not, but I'm not sure I understand the proposal
>> Can I turn the proposal into a question: in the prov-o ontology, I think we
>> are going to have a class QualifiedDerivation (TBC). An instance of QualifiedDerivation,
>> will it be an object of the universe of discourse?
> Yes. But only because a QualifiedDerivation is an Activity (though others disagree on this).

I don't think it's the case at all. A given activity may be the cause of 
many derivations,
and vice-versa a given derivation may be due to 1 or more derivations.
For this reason, I don't think a QualifiedDerivation is an Activity.

> -Tim

Professor Luc Moreau
Electronics and Computer Science   tel:   +44 23 8059 4487
University of Southampton          fax:   +44 23 8059 2865
Southampton SO17 1BJ               email:
United Kingdom           

Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 08:07:30 UTC