- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:09:41 -0500
- To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:29 AM, Luc Moreau wrote: > Hi Graham, > > >>> Proposal 3: Derivation, Association, Responsibility chains, >>> Traceability, Activity Ordering, Revision, Attribution, Quotation, >>> Summary, Original SOurce, CollectionAfterInsertion/Collection After >>> removal belong to the universe of discourse. >> >> I'm inclined to say not, but I'm not sure I understand the proposal > > Can I turn the proposal into a question: in the prov-o ontology, I think we > are going to have a class QualifiedDerivation (TBC). An instance of QualifiedDerivation, > will it be an object of the universe of discourse? Yes. But only because a QualifiedDerivation is an Activity (though others disagree on this). -Tim
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 23:10:12 UTC