- From: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:26:53 +0000
- To: public-prov-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <EMEW3|4628f22dfc5a95b0acd378c4f8ea5724o0GNQx08L.Moreau|ecs.soton.ac.uk|4F1603BD>
Hi Jim, Since we talk about prov-dm here, I am not sure I am following you with this notion of role with specialization. Currently, the prov:role attribute is defined as follows http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/model/ProvenanceModel.html#dfn-role This definition suggests only one form of role. Luc On 17/01/12 23:20, Jim McCusker wrote: > With the current state of things, roles can be expressed using > specializationOf with an extra type on the specialization or as a > qualification on an event. I prefer the former, but many prefer the > latter. If the group is happy with having both methods of specifying > roles, we're done. I'm a little uncomfortable with it, but it seems > that we are talking about two very different levels of formality on > each. If we moved hadRole to Entity from the qualification, then it > becomes easy to translate between the two patterns using OWL. It might > be possible on the qualification too, but it might require inverse > properties to do correctly, and I don't know if it would be > convertable both ways. > > Jim > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk > <mailto:L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>> wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > I am not sure where we are on this issue, whether the discussion > on alternateOf is addressing it, > or whether the current draft is already addressing your concerns. > > Thanks, > Luc > > > On 15/09/11 18:46, Provenance Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > PROV-ISSUE-96 (entities and roles): Relating Roled Entities > with non-Roled Entities [Conceptual Model] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/96 > > Raised by: James McCusker > On product: Conceptual Model > > Let's say we have Entities "Jim McCusker" and "Jim McCusker as > first author of XYZ paper". Under the current proposal, "Jim > McCusker as first author of XYZ paper" is of type Entity and > also of type FirstAuthor, which is a subclass of Entity and is > therefore a Role. Since "Jim McCusker as first author of XYZ > paper" is contextualized by that role, it's not correct for > that to share the same URI as "Jim McCusker". However, there > is some sort of relationship. > > I'd like to propose that complementOf, or whatever succeeds > it, is that relationship. It follows the same pattern of "same > entity in different contexts", as the role is a particular > non-temporal, non-spatial contextualization. > > > > > > > > > > -- > Jim McCusker > Programmer Analyst > Krauthammer Lab, Pathology Informatics > Yale School of Medicine > james.mccusker@yale.edu <mailto:james.mccusker@yale.edu> | (203) 785-6330 > http://krauthammerlab.med.yale.edu > > PhD Student > Tetherless World Constellation > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > mccusj@cs.rpi.edu <mailto:mccusj@cs.rpi.edu> > http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2012 23:27:35 UTC