- From: Daniel Garijo <dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es>
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 10:55:36 +0100
- To: Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl>
- Cc: Provenance Working Group WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 09:56:17 UTC
Hi Paul, our intention is to align the current prov-o draft to prov-dm. That is why we built a list of the main differences between both documents. Some of the changes are inmediate (like the replacement of Recipe with Plan), but some others raise discussions that end up as issues against the dm. However our focus is to align both documents. Best, Daniel 2012/1/4 Paul Groth <p.t.groth@vu.nl> > Hi PROV-O team, > > Reading the notes, I was wondering if it's fair to say that most of the > issues that are there are with respect to issues with the DM and not how to > model those in the ontology? (With maybe the exception of accounts). > > Just trying to get a view on where the team is focusing. > > Thanks, > Paul > > > Timothy Lebo wrote: > >> prov-wg, >> >> The PROV-O team met today to review a list of topics where PROV-O is out >> of sync with PROV-DM. >> >> The summary and notes are at http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/** >> wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_**2012-01-04#Summary<http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/PIL_OWL_Ontology_Meeting_2012-01-04#Summary> >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2012 09:56:17 UTC