- From: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:22:26 -0500
- To: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
Cool. Thanks. -Tim On Dec 12, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu> wrote: > That is a good point. In fact, I am not sure that is valid since the schema is strict on use of the prov namespace. > > I will update the example in the editors draft to use a non-prov namespace. > > Thanks Tim! > > --Stephan > > On Dec 12, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > >> XMLers, >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-xml/#schema-design >> >> section "Elements vs. Attributes" says: >> >> <prov:thing prov:id="id"> >> <prov:elem1 /> >> <prov:elem2 /> >> ... >> <prov:attr1>val1</prov:attr1> >> <prov:attr2>val2</prov:attr2> >> ... >> </prov:thing> >> >> >> I wonder if the attr1, attr2 should be in a namespace other than prov: >> Since there are some attributes in prov:, but attributes can be in other namespaces as well, then perhaps some more elements should be added to that snippet that are not in prov:? >> >> Thanks, >> Tim >> >> >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2012 19:23:02 UTC