- From: Stephan Zednik <zednis@rpi.edu>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:16:55 -0700
- To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
- Cc: W3C provenance WG <public-prov-wg@w3.org>
That is a good point. In fact, I am not sure that is valid since the schema is strict on use of the prov namespace. I will update the example in the editors draft to use a non-prov namespace. Thanks Tim! --Stephan On Dec 12, 2012, at 12:13 PM, Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu> wrote: > XMLers, > > http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-xml/#schema-design > > section "Elements vs. Attributes" says: > > <prov:thing prov:id="id"> > <prov:elem1 /> > <prov:elem2 /> > ... > <prov:attr1>val1</prov:attr1> > <prov:attr2>val2</prov:attr2> > ... > </prov:thing> > > > I wonder if the attr1, attr2 should be in a namespace other than prov: > Since there are some attributes in prov:, but attributes can be in other namespaces as well, then perhaps some more elements should be added to that snippet that are not in prov:? > > Thanks, > Tim > > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2012 19:17:32 UTC