Re: Updated Questionnaire's - comments before Tuesday

Hi Simon,

Thanks for the comments.

1) I changed the vocab usage to allow for external people

2) I think we are just looking for some classification of the type of
implementation. In some sense I like this being open ended. Your
interpretation is correct though.

cheers
Paul


On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Miles, Simon <simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk> wrote:

>  Hello Paul,
>
>  I think the questionnaires seem fine. I had two points:
>
>  1. The Implementation and Vocab Extension questionnaires allowed me to
> not be a W3C member to complete them, but there was no such option for the
> Vocab Usage questionnaire (I just got a log-in box as soon as I went to the
> link).
>
>  2. A similar comment to one I've made before, but in the Implementation
> questionnaire, I'm unsure what information we're trying to get from
> Question 3 (Implementation Type), and whether the reader will interpret our
> intent correctly. Would it be possible to add a little more clarifying
> text? For example, I would interpret the terms to mean the following (but
> I'm not sure I'm correct): "By a framework we mean that your code is used
> as a library by a local client, whereas a service may be used remotely. An
> application does not have a client, but is itself producing or consuming
> provenance data, possibly using a framework or service."
>
>  thanks,
> Simon
>
>    Dr Simon Miles
> Senior Lecturer, Department of Informatics
> Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
> +44 (0)20 7848 1166
>
>   Using Normative Markov Decision Processes for Evaluating Electronic
> Contracts:
> http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1398/
>
>       ------------------------------
> *From:* pgroth@gmail.com [pgroth@gmail.com] on behalf of Paul Groth [
> p.t.groth@vu.nl]
> *Sent:* 07 December 2012 11:58
> *To:* Provenance Working Group WG
> *Subject:* Updated Questionnaire's - comments before Tuesday
>
>  Hi All,
>
>  I've updated our various questionnaires and added a brief intro to the
> site at [1]:
>
>  Below you'll find our four different surveys. Please provide any
> comments on their format, questions before Tuesday next week, in particular
> on the three Questionnaires.
>
>
>    - Implementation Questionnaire<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99999/prov-implementation-survey/> -
>    for software (applications, frameworks, services) that consume and/or
>    generates PROV
>    - Vocabulary Usage Questionnaire<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99999/prov-vocabulary-usage-survey/> -
>    for datasets, websites or other content that makes use of PROV
>    - Vocabulary Extension Questionnaire<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99999/prov-vocabulary-survey/> -
>    for vocabularies, ontologies that extend PROV
>    - Constraints Test Cases<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/testcases/process.html>
>
>
>
>  cheers
> Paul
>
>
>  [1]
> http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvImplementations#Gathering_Implementation_Evidence
>
>
>
>  --
> --
> Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
> Assistant Professor
> - Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
>   Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
> - The Network Institute
> VU University Amsterdam
>



-- 
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
  Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam