RE: Updated Questionnaire's - comments before Tuesday

Hello Paul,

I think the questionnaires seem fine. I had two points:

1. The Implementation and Vocab Extension questionnaires allowed me to not be a W3C member to complete them, but there was no such option for the Vocab Usage questionnaire (I just got a log-in box as soon as I went to the link).

2. A similar comment to one I've made before, but in the Implementation questionnaire, I'm unsure what information we're trying to get from Question 3 (Implementation Type), and whether the reader will interpret our intent correctly. Would it be possible to add a little more clarifying text? For example, I would interpret the terms to mean the following (but I'm not sure I'm correct): "By a framework we mean that your code is used as a library by a local client, whereas a service may be used remotely. An application does not have a client, but is itself producing or consuming provenance data, possibly using a framework or service."

thanks,
Simon

Dr Simon Miles
Senior Lecturer, Department of Informatics
Kings College London, WC2R 2LS, UK
+44 (0)20 7848 1166

Using Normative Markov Decision Processes for Evaluating Electronic Contracts:
http://eprints.dcs.kcl.ac.uk/1398/

________________________________
From: pgroth@gmail.com [pgroth@gmail.com] on behalf of Paul Groth [p.t.groth@vu.nl]
Sent: 07 December 2012 11:58
To: Provenance Working Group WG
Subject: Updated Questionnaire's - comments before Tuesday

Hi All,

I've updated our various questionnaires and added a brief intro to the site at [1]:

Below you'll find our four different surveys. Please provide any comments on their format, questions before Tuesday next week, in particular on the three Questionnaires.


  *   Implementation Questionnaire<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99999/prov-implementation-survey/> - for software (applications, frameworks, services) that consume and/or generates PROV
  *   Vocabulary Usage Questionnaire<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99999/prov-vocabulary-usage-survey/> - for datasets, websites or other content that makes use of PROV
  *   Vocabulary Extension Questionnaire<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99999/prov-vocabulary-survey/> - for vocabularies, ontologies that extend PROV
  *   Constraints Test Cases<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/default/testcases/process.html>


cheers
Paul


[1] http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/ProvImplementations#Gathering_Implementation_Evidence



--
--
Dr. Paul Groth (p.t.groth@vu.nl<mailto:p.t.groth@vu.nl>)
http://www.few.vu.nl/~pgroth/
Assistant Professor
- Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group |
  Artificial Intelligence Section | Department of Computer Science
- The Network Institute
VU University Amsterdam