public-powderwg@w3.org from January 2008 by date

Wednesday, 30 January 2008

Re: Possible New Model (was Re: status report - formal layer) Andrea Perego

Monday, 28 January 2008

Re: [comment] URI/IRI canonicalization in powder-grouping Matt Womer
Re: [comment] URI/IRI canonicalization in powder-grouping Smith, Kevin, VF-Group

Thursday, 24 January 2008

More discussion on the other channel Phil Archer

Tuesday, 22 January 2008

Some test data Phil Archer
Re: Possible New Model (was Re: status report - formal layer) Phil Archer

Monday, 21 January 2008

Re: Possible New Model (was Re: status report - formal layer) Phil Archer
Possible New Model (was Re: status report - formal layer) Phil Archer

Friday, 18 January 2008

Re: status report - formal layer Phil Archer
Re: status report - formal layer Jeremy Carroll
Posts on the GRDDL WG mailing list Phil Archer
Re: Writing up the Carroll Format Phil Archer
Re: status report - formal layer Phil Archer

Thursday, 17 January 2008

Re: Writing up the Carroll Format Jeremy Carroll
Re: status report - formal layer Jeremy Carroll
Re: status report - formal layer Phil Archer
Re: Descriptors linked from RS or DR? (again) Phil Archer
Writing up the Carroll Format Phil Archer
Re: status report - formal layer Phil Archer

Monday, 14 January 2008

status report - formal layer Jeremy Carroll

Friday, 11 January 2008

Re: help with dated entailments ... (for POWDER) Phil Archer

Thursday, 10 January 2008

Re: help with dated entailments ... (for POWDER) Jeremy Carroll
help with dated entailments ... (for POWDER) Jeremy Carroll
Re: operationally, ResourceSets are sets of URIs not resources Phil Archer
Re: operationally, ResourceSets are sets of URIs not resources Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 7 January 2008

Re: Outcome of Meeting with Jeremy Carroll, Stuart Williams and Dan Brickley Phil Archer

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 January 2008 08:54:30 UTC