public-powderwg@w3.org from January 2008 by author

Andrea Perego

• Re: Possible New Model (was Re: status report - formal layer) (Wednesday, 30 January)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: status report - formal layer (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Writing up the Carroll Format (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: status report - formal layer (Thursday, 17 January)
• status report - formal layer (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: help with dated entailments ... (for POWDER) (Thursday, 10 January)
• help with dated entailments ... (for POWDER) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: operationally, ResourceSets are sets of URIs not resources (Thursday, 10 January)

Matt Womer

• Re: [comment] URI/IRI canonicalization in powder-grouping (Monday, 28 January)

Phil Archer

• More discussion on the other channel (Thursday, 24 January)
• Some test data (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Possible New Model (was Re: status report - formal layer) (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Possible New Model (was Re: status report - formal layer) (Monday, 21 January)
• Possible New Model (was Re: status report - formal layer) (Monday, 21 January)
• Re: status report - formal layer (Friday, 18 January)
• Posts on the GRDDL WG mailing list (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Writing up the Carroll Format (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: status report - formal layer (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: status report - formal layer (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: Descriptors linked from RS or DR? (again) (Thursday, 17 January)
• Writing up the Carroll Format (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: status report - formal layer (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: help with dated entailments ... (for POWDER) (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: operationally, ResourceSets are sets of URIs not resources (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Outcome of Meeting with Jeremy Carroll, Stuart Williams and Dan Brickley (Monday, 7 January)

Smith, Kevin, VF-Group

• Re: [comment] URI/IRI canonicalization in powder-grouping (Monday, 28 January)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 January 2008 08:54:30 UTC