- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:48:20 +0000
- To: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
- CC: public-powderwg@w3.org
Phil Archer wrote: > Personally, I am a little reluctant to let go completely of resource set > definitions based on resource properties (cf. URI component properties) > as it is not hard to conceive of real-world situations where this is of > potential usage. For example, an English teacher might publish an > opinion that if the language used in a particular reference document is > en-us then both the spelling and usage of nouns as verbs is not to be > repeated when answering exam questions; if the number of images in a > document exceeds x then the page in unlikely to be suitable for display > on mobile etc. These apply whatever the URI(s) of the resource may be. > At this stage, let's agree to differ on that one. I will move on to making more concrete proposals, and we will need to revisit this disagreement. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 11:48:48 UTC