- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 10:24:40 -0400
- To: cathy.chan@nokia.com, public-pointer-events@w3.org
On 10/3/14 4:53 PM, cathy.chan@nokia.com wrote: > I reviewed the test for 15.20 and provided a minor comment at github. Otherwise it looks good to me in terms of what it's trying to test. > > However, the test doesn't really address what I raised in point #5 in [1]. I was asking whether we need test(s) to verify that the UA handles the touch-action:manipulation CSS value correctly, in a similar way that assertions 15.3 verifies the UA's behavior with touch-action:pan-x. The test that was submitted in PR-1249 merely checks that the computed value of touch-action matches what is being declared, which is a general test for touch-action and nothing specific to manipulation. > > That said, I noted in [1] that the above behavior is only a MAY requirement, so I'm fine with not creating new test cases for that. Unless someone feels really strongly (i.e. is willing to create a new test), I'm also fine with Cathy's recommendation. > Finally, the assertion description of 15.20 currently says "Touch action basic verification (including 'manipulation')", singling out manipulation, apparently to address my comment. I would s/(including 'manipulation')// to avoid confusion. I made that change. -Thanks, Art
Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 14:25:10 UTC