W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > September 2016

Re: Taler HTTP API

From: Jeffrey Burdges <jeffrey.burdges@inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 13:48:21 +0200
Message-ID: <1474285701.19580.228.camel@inria.fr>
To: public-payments-wg@w3.org
On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 11:17 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote:
> At first glance, it looks like the general flow is more or less the
> same, but with digitally signed offers that look more like the Web
> Payments Community Group proposal rather than what the WG has now.

Yes, digitally signed offers are important for us.  Signed offers
combined with coin deposit records provide a cryptographic
proof-of-purchase for customers. 

I'd kinda imagine signatures would be relevant for any scheme that tries
to keep dispute resolution costs extremely low, what we like to call
"true micro-payments".  Anything based on a credit card might be
spending enough on dispute resolution anyways that they need not care. 


Received on Monday, 19 September 2016 11:48:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 19 September 2016 11:48:52 UTC