W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > February 2016

Re: ACTION STRONGLY ENCOURAGED: Flows ready for wider review

From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:21:18 -0500
Message-ID: <56C1442E.6090901@digitalbazaar.com>
To: Matt Saxon <matt.saxon@gmail.com>, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
CC: public-payments-wg@w3.org
On 02/14/2016 05:47 PM, Matt Saxon wrote:
> I dropped it based on my understanding that he basic flow just 
> covered a peer to peer payment and the other flow covered an 
> interaction closer to a web browser payment. If I've misunderstood, 
> please can someone clarify, Adrian?

Please don't drop that flow as it's the most fundamental demonstration
that the Web Payments API can handle "off-Web" cryptocurrency payments.

BIP70 is also interesting, but for different reasons.

-- manu

Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice
Received on Monday, 15 February 2016 03:21:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:14 UTC