W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > February 2016

Re: ACTION STRONGLY ENCOURAGED: Flows ready for wider review

From: Matt Saxon <matt.saxon@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 22:47:21 +0000
Cc: public-payments-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <035BFF09-A147-481B-A8E6-E66E47643572@gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
I dropped it based on my understanding that he basic flow just covered a peer to peer payment and the other flow covered an interaction closer to a web browser payment. If I've misunderstood, please can someone clarify, Adrian?

Sent from my iPhone

> On 14 Feb 2016, at 21:35, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
>> On 02/14/2016 11:54 AM, Matt Saxon wrote:
>> I’ve restructured the flow list into a table, so I would appreciate
>> if you could update the Reviewed By Column when you’ve looked at the
>> flow in detail and submitted feedback to the author.
> Did the Basic Bitcoin Payment get dropped from the table?
> -- manu
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice
> https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/
Received on Sunday, 14 February 2016 22:47:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:14 UTC