Sorry, I haven't been giving those flows as much attention as I should have. I have some review comments to still consider and edits to make based on those. Following the recent Coindesk article[1] which called out the Bitcoin community for not getting involved in this work I got some interest in reviewing the flows. Hopefully we'll see that result in some feedback soon. Adrian [1] http://www.coindesk.com/bitcoin-bad-reputation-payments-standards-w3c/ On 15 February 2016 at 05:21, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On 02/14/2016 05:47 PM, Matt Saxon wrote: > > I dropped it based on my understanding that he basic flow just > > covered a peer to peer payment and the other flow covered an > > interaction closer to a web browser payment. If I've misunderstood, > > please can someone clarify, Adrian? > > Please don't drop that flow as it's the most fundamental demonstration > that the Web Payments API can handle "off-Web" cryptocurrency payments. > > BIP70 is also interesting, but for different reasons. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice > https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/ > >
Received on Monday, 15 February 2016 07:51:59 UTC