Re: ACTION STRONGLY ENCOURAGED: Flows ready for wider review

Sorry, I haven't been giving those flows as much attention as I should have.
I have some review comments to still consider and edits to make based on

Following the recent Coindesk article[1] which called out the Bitcoin
community for not getting involved in this work I got some interest in
reviewing the flows. Hopefully we'll see that result in some feedback soon.



On 15 February 2016 at 05:21, Manu Sporny <> wrote:

> On 02/14/2016 05:47 PM, Matt Saxon wrote:
> > I dropped it based on my understanding that he basic flow just
> > covered a peer to peer payment and the other flow covered an
> > interaction closer to a web browser payment. If I've misunderstood,
> > please can someone clarify, Adrian?
> Please don't drop that flow as it's the most fundamental demonstration
> that the Web Payments API can handle "off-Web" cryptocurrency payments.
> BIP70 is also interesting, but for different reasons.
> -- manu
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice

Received on Monday, 15 February 2016 07:51:59 UTC