- From: Thierry Declerck <declerck@dfki.de>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:38:55 +0200
- To: "John P. McCrae" <john.mccrae@insight-centre.org>, Julia Bosque Gil <jbosque@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: Jorge Gracia <jogracia@unizar.es>, Sander Stolk <ssstolk@gmail.com>, Fahad Khan <anasfkhan81@gmail.com>, public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <b5c84645-bb3a-997b-1c3a-f9e6b9b3d1cc@dfki.de>
Dear John, Julia, Many thanks for the feedbacks! We will discuss the options :-) Cheers Thierry Am 11.07.2019 um 18:16 schrieb John P. McCrae: > Hi Thierry, Julia, all, > > I think this is what the decomp module does: > > https://www.w3.org/2016/05/ontolex/#components > > The example given there is the Spanish 'comunidad autonoma', where the > adjective 'autonomo' has a feminine agreement. The modelling is done > by adding LexInfo properties to the component. > > This is different from FormRestrictions, which also limit the meaning > of a word to only applying to certain forms, e.g., 'goods' is only > used in the plural. In "bolnišnica za živali", I assume the head > (bolnišnica) is free to take any number or case and hence there is no > lexico-semantic restriction on the multiword expression. > > Regards, > John > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 17:02, Julia Bosque Gil <jbosque@fi.upm.es > <mailto:jbosque@fi.upm.es>> wrote: > > Hi Thierry, > > If I understood this right, in this case we are not dealing with > morpho-syntactic features of an entry when used in a specific > |ontolex:LexicalSense| (we would use |lexicog:FormRestriction| in > that case), but you just want to indicate that /živali/ in /za > živali/ (in the MW /bolnišnica za živali/ ) must be in accusative > plural. If that is the case, I am wondering whether here we could > just indicate that the second decomp:subterm of /bolnišnica za > živali/ is the lexical entry /za/, and describe that preposition > by indicating that it assigns accusative case to its nominal > complements. At first it looks like the fact that /živali/ is in > accusative plural depends mostly on the use of /za/ (?). If so, > the restriction on *case* we are referring to is not particular to > this MW, but concerns the grammar of prepositions. For > /bolnišnica za živali/ a potential way of encoding this > information would be to list the components in order and indicate > at the :za lexical entry level that it requires accusative (or > turning to the synsem module to specify a lexinfo:NounPPFrame to > record that /bolnišnica /takes a PP headed by a /:za/ marker). > > I am struggling with the *plural* feature and where to record > this, though: in Spanish,/estación de autobuses/ (bus station) > requires plural in /autobuses (?? estación de autobús)/, but > /parada de autobús /(bus stop) is used in both singular and > plural, probably because of the difference between a "station" > (always for more than one bus line) and a "stop" (for at least one > bus line). So I agree there should be a mechanism to represent > that /bolnišnica /takes a za PP with a noun in plural, maybe this > would be information to address with synsem elements, as well?/ > / > > What do you think? > > Best, > > Julia > > > El jue., 11 jul. 2019 a las 14:47, Thierry Declerck > (<declerck@dfki.de <mailto:declerck@dfki.de>>) escribió: > > Dear All, > > I had just some sessions with Simon Krek on Slovenian > Collocations/MWE > and how to represent those in OntoLex-Lemon. > I think for most of the data we have good solutions. > Only a bit unclear to me how to model restrictions that are to be > applied on a Collocation/MWE. An example is the expression > "Hospital for > Animals" (bolnišnica za živali {@slv}). > On the third component of this expression there is a form > restriction: > it should be used only in accusative and plural. > I would ot use the restriction mechanism described in Lexicog, > but then > the domain of the property would be a decomp:Component (and > the range is > a form, as foreseen) > Another thing that could be useful: define the restrictions > independently of a specific form. It would just list the two > relevant > aspect here: plural and accusative. Then we would need a > mechamis that > goes from the lemma to the corresponding form (the lemma, or > headword, > is given by the decomp:subterm property. > > Cheers > Thierry > > > > -- > > Julia Bosque Gil > PhD Student > Ontology Engineering Group <http://www.oeg-upm.net/> > Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial > Universidad Politécnica de Madrid > -- Thierry Declerck Senior Consultant at DFKI GmbH, Multilinguality and Language Technology Stuhlsatzenhausweg, 3 D-66123 Saarbruecken Phone: +49 681 / 857 75-53 58 Fax: +49 681 / 857 75-53 38 email: declerck@dfki.de ------------------------------------------------------------- Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Jana Koehler (Vorsitzende) Dr. Walter Olthoff Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313 -------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 12 July 2019 08:39:22 UTC