- From: Thierry Declerck <declerck@dfki.de>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:38:55 +0200
- To: "John P. McCrae" <john.mccrae@insight-centre.org>, Julia Bosque Gil <jbosque@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: Jorge Gracia <jogracia@unizar.es>, Sander Stolk <ssstolk@gmail.com>, Fahad Khan <anasfkhan81@gmail.com>, public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <b5c84645-bb3a-997b-1c3a-f9e6b9b3d1cc@dfki.de>
Dear John, Julia,
Many thanks for the feedbacks! We will discuss the options :-)
Cheers
Thierry
Am 11.07.2019 um 18:16 schrieb John P. McCrae:
> Hi Thierry, Julia, all,
>
> I think this is what the decomp module does:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2016/05/ontolex/#components
>
> The example given there is the Spanish 'comunidad autonoma', where the
> adjective 'autonomo' has a feminine agreement. The modelling is done
> by adding LexInfo properties to the component.
>
> This is different from FormRestrictions, which also limit the meaning
> of a word to only applying to certain forms, e.g., 'goods' is only
> used in the plural. In "bolnišnica za živali", I assume the head
> (bolnišnica) is free to take any number or case and hence there is no
> lexico-semantic restriction on the multiword expression.
>
> Regards,
> John
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 17:02, Julia Bosque Gil <jbosque@fi.upm.es
> <mailto:jbosque@fi.upm.es>> wrote:
>
> Hi Thierry,
>
> If I understood this right, in this case we are not dealing with
> morpho-syntactic features of an entry when used in a specific
> |ontolex:LexicalSense| (we would use |lexicog:FormRestriction| in
> that case), but you just want to indicate that /živali/ in /za
> živali/ (in the MW /bolnišnica za živali/ ) must be in accusative
> plural. If that is the case, I am wondering whether here we could
> just indicate that the second decomp:subterm of /bolnišnica za
> živali/ is the lexical entry /za/, and describe that preposition
> by indicating that it assigns accusative case to its nominal
> complements. At first it looks like the fact that /živali/ is in
> accusative plural depends mostly on the use of /za/ (?). If so,
> the restriction on *case* we are referring to is not particular to
> this MW, but concerns the grammar of prepositions. For
> /bolnišnica za živali/ a potential way of encoding this
> information would be to list the components in order and indicate
> at the :za lexical entry level that it requires accusative (or
> turning to the synsem module to specify a lexinfo:NounPPFrame to
> record that /bolnišnica /takes a PP headed by a /:za/ marker).
>
> I am struggling with the *plural* feature and where to record
> this, though: in Spanish,/estación de autobuses/ (bus station)
> requires plural in /autobuses (?? estación de autobús)/, but
> /parada de autobús /(bus stop) is used in both singular and
> plural, probably because of the difference between a "station"
> (always for more than one bus line) and a "stop" (for at least one
> bus line). So I agree there should be a mechanism to represent
> that /bolnišnica /takes a za PP with a noun in plural, maybe this
> would be information to address with synsem elements, as well?/
> /
>
> What do you think?
>
> Best,
>
> Julia
>
>
> El jue., 11 jul. 2019 a las 14:47, Thierry Declerck
> (<declerck@dfki.de <mailto:declerck@dfki.de>>) escribió:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I had just some sessions with Simon Krek on Slovenian
> Collocations/MWE
> and how to represent those in OntoLex-Lemon.
> I think for most of the data we have good solutions.
> Only a bit unclear to me how to model restrictions that are to be
> applied on a Collocation/MWE. An example is the expression
> "Hospital for
> Animals" (bolnišnica za živali {@slv}).
> On the third component of this expression there is a form
> restriction:
> it should be used only in accusative and plural.
> I would ot use the restriction mechanism described in Lexicog,
> but then
> the domain of the property would be a decomp:Component (and
> the range is
> a form, as foreseen)
> Another thing that could be useful: define the restrictions
> independently of a specific form. It would just list the two
> relevant
> aspect here: plural and accusative. Then we would need a
> mechamis that
> goes from the lemma to the corresponding form (the lemma, or
> headword,
> is given by the decomp:subterm property.
>
> Cheers
> Thierry
>
>
>
> --
>
> Julia Bosque Gil
> PhD Student
> Ontology Engineering Group <http://www.oeg-upm.net/>
> Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
> Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
>
--
Thierry Declerck
Senior Consultant at DFKI GmbH, Multilinguality and Language Technology
Stuhlsatzenhausweg, 3
D-66123 Saarbruecken
Phone: +49 681 / 857 75-53 58
Fax: +49 681 / 857 75-53 38
email: declerck@dfki.de
-------------------------------------------------------------
Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche Intelligenz GmbH
Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Geschäftsführung:
Prof. Dr. Jana Koehler (Vorsitzende)
Dr. Walter Olthoff
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats:
Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
-------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 12 July 2019 08:39:22 UTC