W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ontolex@w3.org > July 2018

Re: Inconsistent capitalization of "multiwordexpression" between the specification and the ontology

From: John McCrae <john.mccrae@insight-centre.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:13:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHLDFnpX9fdw6-iNePCN2uUrqdwcKLFX1dWwaKdaMWfBLxev=w@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: John McCrae <john.mccrae@insight-centre.org>
Date: Mon 16 Jul 2018, 16:08
Subject: Re: Inconsistent capitalization of "multiwordexpression" between
the specification and the ontology
To: Manuel Fiorelli <manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com>


Hi Manuel,

Thanks for this. It probably should be MultiwordExpression like in the
specification, but I think it is easier to change the specification than
the ontology. So I would propose we keep the ontology and use
MultiWordExpression.

Any other opinions?

Regards,
John

On Mon 16 Jul 2018, 15:59 Manuel Fiorelli, <manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear all
>
> I've just spotted an inconsistency between the specification (
> https://www.w3.org/2016/05/ontolex/#lexical-entries) and the ontology (
> https://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/ontolex.rdf):
>
>    - the specification contains *ontolex:MultiwordExpression* (the word
>    "word" is lower case)
>    - the ontology contains *ontolex:MultiWordExpression* (the word "Word"
>    is upper case)
>
> I don't know whether the specification or the ontology should prevail in
> such cases, but for sure if I follow the specification my "multi word
> expressions" will be missclassified by an ontology reasoner.
>
> Without delving into the general case, in this specific situation which
> alternative is the right one?
>
> --
> Manuel Fiorelli
>
Received on Monday, 16 July 2018 14:13:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:37:02 UTC