- From: John McCrae <john.mccrae@insight-centre.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 16:13:05 +0200
- To: public-ontolex <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHLDFnpX9fdw6-iNePCN2uUrqdwcKLFX1dWwaKdaMWfBLxev=w@mail.gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message --------- From: John McCrae <john.mccrae@insight-centre.org> Date: Mon 16 Jul 2018, 16:08 Subject: Re: Inconsistent capitalization of "multiwordexpression" between the specification and the ontology To: Manuel Fiorelli <manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com> Hi Manuel, Thanks for this. It probably should be MultiwordExpression like in the specification, but I think it is easier to change the specification than the ontology. So I would propose we keep the ontology and use MultiWordExpression. Any other opinions? Regards, John On Mon 16 Jul 2018, 15:59 Manuel Fiorelli, <manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all > > I've just spotted an inconsistency between the specification ( > https://www.w3.org/2016/05/ontolex/#lexical-entries) and the ontology ( > https://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/ontolex.rdf): > > - the specification contains *ontolex:MultiwordExpression* (the word > "word" is lower case) > - the ontology contains *ontolex:MultiWordExpression* (the word "Word" > is upper case) > > I don't know whether the specification or the ontology should prevail in > such cases, but for sure if I follow the specification my "multi word > expressions" will be missclassified by an ontology reasoner. > > Without delving into the general case, in this specific situation which > alternative is the right one? > > -- > Manuel Fiorelli >
Received on Monday, 16 July 2018 14:13:38 UTC