- From: Tom Knorr <tknorr@NeuroCollective.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:31:05 -0700
- To: public-ontolex@w3.org
- Message-ID: <8f1a2965-c419-2954-abdd-644658737834@NeuroCollective.com>
My vote is to change the "final report" specification, although it is a cosmetic, not technical issue, but in multiple locations, incl. rdf samples. 'CamelCased' is an accepted standard to create single word labels from multiple words, at least in the programming world. 'multi-word' vs 'multiword': I would write it hyphenated to indicate where I want to separate the two words without actually using two words (as a general rule). Both variants are acceptable. Tom On 07/16/2018 07:13 AM, John McCrae wrote: > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: *John McCrae* <john.mccrae@insight-centre.org > <mailto:john.mccrae@insight-centre.org>> > Date: Mon 16 Jul 2018, 16:08 > Subject: Re: Inconsistent capitalization of "multiwordexpression" > between the specification and the ontology > To: Manuel Fiorelli <manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com > <mailto:manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com>> > > > Hi Manuel, > > Thanks for this. It probably should be MultiwordExpression like in the > specification, but I think it is easier to change the specification > than the ontology. So I would propose we keep the ontology and use > MultiWordExpression. > > Any other opinions? > > Regards, > John > > On Mon 16 Jul 2018, 15:59 Manuel Fiorelli, <manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com > <mailto:manuel.fiorelli@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Dear all > > I've just spotted an inconsistency between the specification > (https://www.w3.org/2016/05/ontolex/#lexical-entries) and the > ontology (https://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/ontolex.rdf): > > * the specification contains /ontolex:MultiwordExpression/ (the > word "word" is lower case) > * the ontology contains /ontolex:MultiWordExpression/ (the word > "Word" is upper case) > > I don't know whether the specification or the ontology should > prevail in such cases, but for sure if I follow the specification > my "multi word expressions" will be missclassified by an ontology > reasoner. > > Without delving into the general case, in this specific situation > which alternative is the right one? > > -- > Manuel Fiorelli > -- Tom Knorr Independent Consultant currently working on The NeuroCollective www.NeuroCollective.com Blog: http://www.neurocollective.com/blog/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-knorr-4406406/
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2018 15:31:40 UTC