Re: progress on release of first specification of ontolex

Hi Philipp,

On 2015-11-6 0:02, Philipp Cimiano wrote:
>  thanks, but why does http://www.lexvo.org/page/iso639-3/eng resolve
> properly while http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-1/en does not?

Could you clarify what you mean about the latter not resolving?  As far
as I can tell, it returns an owl:sameAs statement leading to
http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-3/eng

Do you mean that from a usability perspective, it might be helpful to
duplicate all the information that is returned for
http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-3/eng
instead of just returning an owl:sameAs statement?

Best regards,
Gerard

> Am 05.11.15 um 10:49 schrieb Gerard de Melo:
>> Hi Philipp,
>>
>> For Lexvo.org, you can either use 3-letter ISO 639-3 codes such as
>>
>>     http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-3/eng
>>
>> or 2-letter ISO 639-1 codes such as
>>
>>     http://lexvo.org/id/iso639-1/en
>>
>> Gerard
>>
>>
>> On 2015-11-5 17:03, Philipp Cimiano wrote:
>>> And one small thing:
>>>
>>> in many examples we use the dublin core terms property "language" to
>>> express language information.
>>>
>>> Sometimes we use "eng" and "en" as language identifier (local name) with
>>> respect to the LOC and LEXVO datasets.
>>>
>>> It seems to me that there are some mistakes here.
>>>
>>> It seems that LOC uses "eng" and LEXVO uses "en".
>>>
>>> For instance:
>>>
>>> http://www.lexvo.org/page/iso639-1/eng -> does not resolve property,
>>> while
>>>
>>> http://www.lexvo.org/page/iso639-1/en -> does resolve
>>>
>>> On the other hand:
>>>
>>> http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-2/en -> does not resolve, while
>>>
>>> http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-2/eng -> does resolve
>>>
>>> Thus, in all examples we should use:
>>>
>>> lexvo:en and loc:eng to indicate language information.
>>>
>>> A minor thing, but still...
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Philipp.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 05.11.15 um 09:38 schrieb Philipp Cimiano:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>>   apologies for my silence in the last weeks. I have been distracted by
>>>> many other things in October. Now I am working on the release of the
>>>> ontolex spec with high priority. I have worked through all the
>>>> normative sections of the specification. There are smaller issues that
>>>> I will clarify with the main stakeholders of these modules directly.
>>>>
>>>> It is now time to have a final check of the spec if you want.
>>>>
>>>> I am confident that I will finish the thorough check of the model in
>>>> the next few weeks.
>>>>
>>>> I will then give all the opportunity of doing a final check in the
>>>> first two weeks of December.
>>>>
>>>> We will then release the specification of the model this year.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Philipp.
>>>>
>>>>
>

Received on Friday, 6 November 2015 03:37:27 UTC