LIME Final Model

Hi Armando, Manuel, all,

So I was looking at the model proposed in the recent paper (file: lime.png)
in comparison to the version that currently exists in the Wiki:

https://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Final_Model_Specification#Metadata_.28lime.29

Here are the changes I see:


   1. New class 'Conceptualization'
   2. ontolex:ConceptLexicon => lime:LexicalConceptSet
   3. New property 'lexicalizationModel'
   4. New property 'concepts'
   5. New properties 'links' and 'avgNumOfLinks' replacing reuse of
   'lexicalizations' and 'avgNumOfLexicalizations' on LexicalLinkSet
   6. Subclasses of ResourceCoverage: LexicalizationCoverage and
   LexicalLinkCoverage
   7. Properties avgNumOfLexicalization, percentage, lexicalizations no
   longer on Lexicalization
   8. Properties lexicalEntries on LexicalizationCoverage

I propose we resolve these changes as follows

   1. 'Conceptualization' currently doesn't do much, either we introduce
   some properties here (e.g., 'concepts') or we don't include this new class.
   2. This class is useful in the core as well, it should thus be defined
   there. I propose the name 'ConceptSet' as a compromise name.
   3. Accept
   4. Accept
   5. Accept
   6. Accept, but see next point
   7. Reject, currently we have the axiom ResourceCoverage ⊑ resourceType
   exactly 1. But we would like to say the number of lexicalizations etc. for
   *all* resources, hence these properties should have the appropriate domain.
   In fact I would like to make a suggestion and say that resource coverage
   are specializations of lexicalizations or lexical link sets. That is add
   the axioms LexicalizationCoverage ≡ ResourceCoverage ⊓ Lexicalization and
   LexicalLinkCoverage ≡ ResourceCoverage ⊓ LexicalLinkSet.
   8. Accept.


I attach the resulting updated model according to my resolution.


Regards,

John

Received on Friday, 23 January 2015 12:59:37 UTC