- From: Armando Stellato <stellato@info.uniroma2.it>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 19:18:21 +0100
- To: <public-ontolex@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DUB408-EAS208312AE369339A4C8A2E2DA0410@phx.gbl>
Hi all, since we had a few emails about metadata and last touches to the model, here's a resume of things agreed and things appended. Pls John revise: 1. Agreed: The set of synsets in wordnet *is not* considered as an ontology in the ontology-lexicon dualism. It is rather the semantic backbone of a Lexicon. a. They are all mutually disjoint b. Manuel and me agree on the use of skos:ConceptScheme in order to collect sets of LexicalConcepts, but explained that we need a metadata element for it c. John proposes to subclass skos:ConceptScheme (AND void:Dataset) to give this element a place in the core model, providing metadata too. Also a property pointing to it (for LexicalLinksets and Conceptualizations) needs to be named i. The name proposed for the property by John is: conceptDataset, the name for the subclass of skos:ConceptScheme/void:Dataset is ConceptualLexicon d. Manuel and Armando propose to make a distinction: i. ConceptualizedLexicon for a whole wordnet-like resource (lexical entries + synsets + conceptualization). E.g. WordNet (as a whole) is a ConceptualizedLexicon ii. LexicalConceptSet for the set of LexicalConcepts (which can subclass skos:ConceptScheme and void:Dataset as a whole). Alternatively, keep it only in the metadata and use just skos:ConceptScheme in the data iii. The property in Conceptualizations and LexicalLinksets should point only to the set of LexicalConcepts, thus can be conceptDataset as proposed by John (and they are obviously LexicalConcepts) 2. The lexicalization (called: LexicalizationSet), the ontology, the lexicon and the (eventual) conceptualization are parts of an ontology-lexicon a. They are mutually disjoint b. A conceptualization is the set of links between LexicalEntries and LexicalConcepts (e.g. the senses and related properties in WordNet connecting words to synsets). i. This linking is called Conceptualization in that, in resources such as WordNet, it is the concepts that exist to give (a lexical) meaning to the words, and not the contrary (as it is for an ontology and its lexicalization) 3. Use of denotes/evokes: denotes refers to SKOS concepts or OWL entities, and evokes to :LexicalConcepts. a. :LexicalConcepts are also skos:Concepts, but for domain skos:Concepts, denotes must be used. We will address others in a next email. Cheers, Armando
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2015 18:19:01 UTC